The Perception Question

As we know, philosophically, if a tree falls in the woods and it falls on the only person who was there to hear it, the tree wouldn’t have made a noise when it killed them – presumably because it would be trying to sneak up on the blighter.

Or something. Welcome to the wonderful world of perception. At an evolutionary level we humans tend to think of ourselves as pretty special. And yet from what we know about perception that isn’t true in all ways.

Take birds for example. Many birds “know” which way is North. They don’t have to think about it. They don’t have to take out their compass or whatever, they just know. The same way you know which way is down or the same way you know when it’s dark or light. You don’t have to think “oh, it’s dark”, you just know. That’s perception.

Now in this example we’re pretty sure that we agree with birds where North is. And so it doesn’t feel that weird knowing they can sense it.

But what about hummingbirds? They can see infra-red as a colour. Now, in theory we can see infra-red too. But of course infra-red isn’t red in just the same way that green isn’t red. It’s another colour and we can’t see it and they can. They don’t turn on their infra-red vision to see it, they just see it. And we never will. Because to make it visible to us we have to turn off the other colours and substitute something else (red).

So we can see that the world isn’t necessarily as we perceive it. The world isn’t the way a human sees it where the other animals are getting it wrong. The world has never truly been seen by anything. We just happen to see it and sense it in one way.

Back to the hummingbird. The hummingbird also perceives the world more slowly than we do. If you were jogging along, the bird would perceive you as moving slowly compared to everything else. That’s why birds seem to move out of the way of cars far too late. Even time is not constantly perceived. We know that we can measure its progress, but what does it mean if we know we aren’t perceiving it at the same speed as anything else on our planet?* To birds we are lumbering slow moving things, like elephants seem to us.

So why are we so sure of ourselves? Unless you’re really thinking about the issue people find it very difficult to think that the world might not be as they are perceiving. The answer is, of course, evolution. People who were constantly questioning what they perceived have been deselected. If you approach a lion wondering if it really is a lion you might not live long enough to have so many children.

We’ve been hearing a lot in the last few years about scientists attacking religion (Richard Dawkins, for example) and while I’m not religious, I really think science is being badly misrepresented. The best way to make people question their devout beliefs is to show them things like this. Now you might have read this and seen it as a confirmation of God’s splendor and mysterious ways. But I like to think that subjects like this remind us that you shouldn’t really believe received wisdom, especially not the received wisdom of your own brain or upbringing. Go and find out for yourself.

Just quickly, I’d like to tie this back to the subject of Free Will I discussed last year. Hopefully you can see why many scientists and philosophers believe that free will is an illusion of a similar kind to time and vision. It is useful to believe that we are consciously in charge of what we’re doing, but we might not be. And if that doesn’t make you question what’s going on in the world, then I don’t know what will.

*surely there’s a low chance those aliens we meet in sci-fi are actually all going to perceive time at the same rate as us – but I imagine it would make conversation a bit difficult.

7 thoughts on “The Perception Question

  1. Nick Ollivère says:

    I was really fascinated by this idea of hummingbirds perceiving time differently. I’ve tried to look for more information but only come up with this:http://uk.gamespot.com/pages/forums/show_msgs.php?topic_id=25903424which isn’t exactly scientific. Do you know anywhere else?

  2. Alex Andronov says:

    You may have had problems searching because you were being too specific, it’s all birds that perceive time more rapidly – not just hummingbirds. I only used hummingbirds because they perceive infra-red (not all birds do that).Here’s something:”This is, of course, only a very external view of the mechanics of meditation, such as is proposed by the physicist R. B. Rucker in his book Geometry, Relativity and the Fourth Dimension, but it does lead us to several exciting implications concerning the experience of time. Clearly, variations in temporal perception are a factor separating one individual consciousness from another within a species and, to an even greater degree, separating the conscious awareness of different species. It may be said, indeed, that each distinct variation in the pattern of temporal recognition constitutes an entirely different universe of perception. For example, birds have a capacity for temporal recognition eight to ten times more rapid than we do. For them, pictures flashing at twenty-four frames per second, which appear to us as a continuous, moving picture, remain still photos until the velocity of 240 frames per second is reached. Likewise, sounds which are to us a continuous whistle are to birds separate and distinct peeps. In other words, birds are able to record ten times as many granulated perceptions as we can in any given temporal interval, which accounts for the acute rapidity of their reflex responses. It is even possible to say this perceptual rapidity was not developed in birds to enhance flight ability, but rather that birds fly only because it is a movement which suitably embodies and expresses the perceptual rapidity.The sense of time, then, is related to the rate of change in phenomenal experience.”from: Homage To Pythagoras

  3. Alex Andronov says:

    There is a lot of bad science on that thread.

  4. Alex Andronov says:

    Anyway as I’m sure you’re aware – for birds – time flies!Thank you, I’m here all week!

  5. Nick Ollivère says:

    I think I misread the original post. I thought you were saying time is slower for hummingbirds, rather than that they perceive time as slower, which is not quite so radical.So, is time a constant with every being viewing it differently? If so, then I don’t think religious people will be worried, will they?

  6. Alex Andronov says:

    The problem I was aiming at is this:a) Time is a constantb) We perceive time differently than all other animals on earth.c) Therefore we can’t really be sure of anything.d) Therefore being sure of God is a bit silly – How can you be sure we know what God is when we weren’t even important enough to be allowed to see all of the colours in the world?

  7. Nick Ollivère says:

    Of course I agree with you. The problem in trying to convince those who are religious is that they see God as beyond science. You cannot prove or disprove anything about him, you can’t argue logically and scientically about something that is beyond logic and science. Anything of this world, or this galaxy or universe, is nothing to do with God. He exists (or he doesn’t ‘exist’ but ‘is’) beyond and within all that.But this is all about God. When dealing with religious people it is far easier to attack the practices that they uphold as necessary. As I believe Scott Adams said, why have they chosen the religion they have? Did they really evaluate every single one before deciding? Or did they just pick the one their parents followed?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: